Erin Griffith
tech reporter, The New York Times · Tech reporter, The New York Times
Titles as the sources gave them. In 2 entries, with 2 checked quotations.
Who they are
Roles and parties from Wikidata and from the sources in the Base, as precise as each gives them. When we compare what groups say, each statement counts in the group the person belonged to that day.
- Tech reporter, The New York Timessource
What they said
Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.
“An $80 billion net loss seems insane, but it's actually kind of a weird accounting quirk where they have to count some convertible debt that they issue to some of their shareholders as a net loss and that will essentially be cleared in the next quarter or then or by the time they go public.”
“the S1 that we saw did not have Q3 numbers in it and they've already kind of previewed those numbers to their investors and our reporting and others have shown that the growth is actually slowing in in the third quarter”
In the Base
Every entry they appear in.
What Anthropic's S-1 Tells Us About the A.I. Business | Hard Fork
In a 53-minute episode, Hard Fork discusses Anthropic's IPO filing with New York Times reporter Erin Griffith: its losses, slowing growth, safety risk factors and governance. Later the panel covers the midterms, a PHP vulnerability, Microsoft buyouts and an Anthropic study of experts deferring to AI.
Anthropic’s Quest to Give A.I. Morals
In a 44-minute Hard Fork episode, guest host Max Read talks with New York Times reporters Elizabeth Dias and Erin Griffith and opinion writer David Wallace-Wells about Dias's report on Anthropic's private meetings with religious thinkers. Dias describes the meetings, held mostly under non-disclosure agreements, as part research and part evangelism, and says Anthropic stayed uncertain whether its models are conscious.