The BasePodcastHard Fork (The New York Times)44 min
Anthropic’s Quest to Give A.I. Morals
In a 44-minute Hard Fork episode, guest host Max Read talks with New York Times reporters Elizabeth Dias and Erin Griffith and opinion writer David Wallace-Wells about Dias's report on Anthropic's private meetings with religious thinkers. Dias describes the meetings, held mostly under non-disclosure agreements, as part research and part evangelism, and says Anthropic stayed uncertain whether its models are conscious.
Why it matters
The same thing, for different readers.
What it means for you
The values built into Claude, a chatbot ordinary people use, are being shaped partly through private meetings with religious thinkers.
For lawmakers
Private consultations on an AI's values raise whether companies should disclose whom they consulted, under what secrecy terms, and what changed as a result.
The question it raises
Who should decide what counts as 'good' for an AI: a company, religious traditions, or the public, and does the answer change if AI could be conscious?
In their own words
Every quotation was found, word for word, in the text we saved from the source.
From our own transcript of the episode’s audio, made by machine. Speaker names come from what is said, not from a voice match.
“the story started for me when I was hearing about these different religious thinkers sort of across the whole world who were going into meetings at Anthropic's headquarters”
“Anthropic was very careful in all of their interviews with me to say very clearly that they're uncertain, right? Chris never went as far as saying, like, absolutely, these are conscious beings.”
“I think for Anthropic, it was part research and part evangelism. That's, that was pretty clear.”
“whenever I find in my reporting that there's an NDA about like a moral topic, you know, and it makes me immediately ask, okay, who's benefiting from this?”
“a goal of their conversations with these religious thinkers was about protecting humanity. And the solution for them for that is to make Claude good. They were also concerned about Claude.”
The record
- Questions
- What values should AI have, and could it have a mind of its own? · Who can demand evidence, delay a release or stop an unsafe deployment?
- People
- Max Read (Speaks, Guest host, Hard Fork) · Elizabeth Dias (Speaks, National religion correspondent, The New York Times) · Erin Griffith (Speaks, Tech reporter, The New York Times) · David Wallace-Wells (Speaks, Opinion writer, The New York Times) · Christopher Olah (About them, Co-founder, Anthropic)
- Also covered by
- Hard Fork (YouTube) · Hard Fork (YouTube) · Hard Fork
- What we read
- We read the whole source.
- Found by
- The Radar, run of October 12, 2026, via
nyt-technology(tier 2: a major outlet’s own reporting) - Cite this
- Hard Fork (The New York Times), “Anthropic’s Quest to Give A.I. Morals”, October 9, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/hard-fork-2026-10-09-anthropic-ai-morals