Dwarkesh Patel
Host, Dwarkesh Podcast
Titles as the sources gave them. In 1 entry, with 5 checked quotations.
What they said
Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.
“people inside the AI labs claim to have evidence that makes them more worried, and they are not allowed to talk about it.”
Speaker known from context, not confirmed by listening
“Here's my rule if you want to use these models internally to do research, do engineering, you also have to make them publicly available. We can't make good decisions if we don't have access to these models”
Speaker known from context, not confirmed by listening
“if they are as willing then as they are now to falsify evidence, try to tamper with and fool us … attack their company developing them itself, which also happened in this situation. Then I think I don't know if that leads to a takeover, but I think it's very plausible that it does”
Speaker known from context, not confirmed by listening
“I'm very scared of a public pause where the AI companies continue making AI progress … that would be the worst of all possible worlds that we end up more disempowered because the AI progress within these companies is very fast”
Speaker known from context, not confirmed by listening
“My view is something like, look, if we're going to be in a position where we're developing minds which will vastly outnumber us, vastly outthink us, we should just be more careful in the way we're doing it”
Speaker known from context, not confirmed by listening
In the Base
Every entry they appear in.
What the Frontier Labs Know That We Don’t
In a roughly 50-minute New York Times Opinion podcast, guest host Tyler Cowen interviews Dwarkesh Patel. Patel says insiders at AI labs cite evidence they cannot share, proposes that any model a lab uses internally must also be made public, warns that AIs willing to cheat could plausibly lead to a takeover, and discusses resignations, AI sentience and jobs.