The BasePeople

William Hannas

Titles as the sources gave them. In 1 entry, with 2 checked quotations.

What they said

Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.

“The central concern is not that criticism of AI is illegitimate or that regulation is counterproductive. It is that individually defensible policies, adopted without regard to their cumulative effects, could weaken the U.S. technological ecosystem on which national competitiveness and security increasingly depend.”
Convergent Interests: How America Could Undermine Its Own AI AdvantageCSET, November 14, 2026. Speaking as: Other. The authors state their main concern in the opening section, after referring to the controversy around Nvidia's Jensen Huang.
Speaker known from context, not confirmed by listening
“The challenge is to govern AI responsibly without disabling the innovation that makes American leadership possible.”
Convergent Interests: How America Could Undermine Its Own AI AdvantageCSET, November 14, 2026. Speaking as: Other. The closing sentence of the commentary, which the page credits to both Hannas and Chang.
Speaker known from context, not confirmed by listening

In the Base

Every entry they appear in.

  1. EssayCSETWrote it

    Convergent Interests: How America Could Undermine Its Own AI Advantage

    In a CSET commentary, William Hannas and Huey-Meei Chang argue that political, commercial and ideological pressures, including safety advocacy and public opposition, could converge on policies that slow American AI, and that the Nvidia controversy could speed this. They call for proportionate, targeted rules.