Vladimir Nesov
Titles as the sources gave them. In 1 entry, with 1 checked quotation.
What they said
Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.
“Hardware/economics/industry will already be coincidentally pacing the scaling, starting pretty much right now, for reasons unrelated to (the risk of) AI incidents.”
In the Base
Every entry they appear in.
Minimum required pacing: finish aligning it before you train the next one
On the AI Alignment Forum, an author writing as orthonormal proposes a minimum pacing rule: a lab may not train its next, more capable generation of models until significant alignment problems in the current one are adequately resolved, as judged by several independent alignment organizations. The author calls it a vague heuristic, not a concrete proposal, and lists open questions.