Peter Lewis
columnist; non-executive chair of Essential, a progressive strategic communications and research company
Titles as the sources gave them. In 1 entry, with 4 checked quotations.
What they said
Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.
“The “inevitability doctrine” demands we concede rather than properly explore and negotiate these trade-offs. This facade of democracy leads to its populist backlash.”
“The biggest danger to our democracy this technology poses is not in the cynical misuse of an untested and unregulated deployment (although this will be hugely destructive) but in the broader sense that we have no say in what is happening to us.”
“In our parliament over the coming weeks there will be fights to land privacy reform, a digital duty of care, standards on datacentres and rules on how governments will use the technology on its citizens.”
“But the resistance many of us feel is real and, so long as we remain a democracy, it will be at the ballot box where we will have the opportunity to demand those who purport to lead us challenge this sense of the inevitable. Because here’s the thing: inevitability is also a choice.”
In the Base
Every entry they appear in.
The biggest threat from AI is the sense that we have no say in it. To that I say game on
In a Guardian opinion column, Peter Lewis argues that tech companies and the White House promote a sense of AI's inevitability that shuts citizens out of decisions. Lewis cites Australian pushback, including a campaign against Coles's partnership with Palantir, creators seeking compensation and Firmus's abandoned share listing, as signs that inevitability is a choice.