Paul Kedrosky
Partner, SK Ventures; fellow, MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy
Titles as the sources gave them. In 2 entries, with 3 checked quotations.
What they said
Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.
“A bubble is whenever asset prices detach from any semblance of economic reality. We have one of the largest CapEx competitive CapEx spending waves in history.”
“This has been my complaint from the very beginning of the process by which these companies have launched models that they've essentially been conducting unlicensed drug trials on the public”
“I think we're inevitably headed towards a world of where there's going to be after some kind of terrible event there's going to be some kind of post hoc regulation imposed but it'll only be after consequential damage”
In the Base
Every entry they appear in.
Will Generative AI do more harm than good?
In a short Substack post, Gary Marcus lists harms of generative AI, including deepfakes, phishing, disinformation and the wave of hacks called "Black October". Marcus cites Apollo economist Torsten Slok on missing benefits and argues AI has so far been a net harm.
Is There an A.I. Bubble? A Debate.
In a debate hosted by Ezra Klein, Paul Kedrosky argues AI investment is a debt-fuelled bubble whose failure would spread through the economy, while Azeem Azhar argues demand for compute is still real and outstrips supply. Both expect regulation; Kedrosky predicts it will come only after a damaging event, and Azhar says self-regulation does not work.