The BasePeople

Matthew Botvinick

Senior fellow, Yale Law School; author of the forthcoming book AI and Political Freedom

Titles as the sources gave them. In 1 entry, with 4 checked quotations.

What they said

Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.

“Placing these two scenarios side by side reveals an elemental truth: there can be no such thing as safe AI unless we secure the future of constitutional democracy and the rule of law.”
One essential ingredient for AI safety? DemocracyThe Guardian, October 12, 2026. After comparing the same 'safe' AI system placed in a democracy and in an authoritarian state.
“By creating national security crises – cyberattacks, for example – AI will multiply opportunities for governments to invoke emergency powers, powers that, once claimed, are rarely relinquished.”
One essential ingredient for AI safety? DemocracyThe Guardian, October 12, 2026. On how AI itself will put new pressure on democratic institutions.
“As executive agencies begin to leverage AI, we should also furnish Congress and the courts with equally powerful AI tools, so that their oversight can keep pace.”
One essential ingredient for AI safety? DemocracyThe Guardian, October 12, 2026. Part of Botvinick's proposed first steps, alongside reforming US emergency and surveillance law.
“The leading AI labs all describe AI safety as core to their mission. If they mean what they say, then – for the reasons I’ve highlighted – they bear a duty to stand up for basic constitutional principles, despite the commercial risks.”
One essential ingredient for AI safety? DemocracyThe Guardian, October 12, 2026. After noting that tech companies once spoke out on surveillance and voting rights but have recently gone quiet on democracy.

In the Base

Every entry they appear in.

  1. EssayThe GuardianWrote it

    One essential ingredient for AI safety? Democracy

    In a Guardian opinion piece, Matthew Botvinick, a Yale Law School senior fellow whose bio notes a current research position at Anthropic, argues that AI cannot be safe without constitutional democracy. Botvinick proposes limits on emergency and surveillance powers and AI tools for Congress and the courts, and urges AI labs to speak up for democracy.