Kevin Frazier
Director of the AI Innovation and Law Program, University of Texas School of Law, and senior editor at Lawfare · Director of the AI Innovation & Law Program, University of Texas School of Law · Senior Editor, Lawfare
Titles as the sources gave them. In 3 entries, with 3 checked quotations.
What they said
Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.
“Who protects the mission from the founders if their interpretation of it changes?”
“What happens when the founders lose a 4–3 vote and decide the governance structure itself is the problem?”
“Unlike a charter amendment or a merger, this route does not require the board’s approval at all — and, unlike the first two end runs, nothing in the filings forecloses it.”
In the Base
Every entry they appear in.
Lawfare Daily: Anthropic’s Safety Mission vs. Public-Company Pressure
In a 54-minute interview, Lawfare's Kevin Frazier and Harvard Law School's Roberto Tallarita go through the corporate structure in Anthropic's S-1: a public benefit corporation, a trust that appoints most directors, and founder-held super-voting shares. Tallarita doubts any of it will reliably hold against financial pressure.
Will Anthropic’s post-IPO governance really protect its safety mission?
In a guest post, law professor Kevin Frazier reads Anthropic's prospectus and argues that shareholders who clear a voting threshold could change or bypass the Long-Term Benefit Trust, so the mission's protection rests on governance choices that can be rewritten.
Lawfare Daily: Investigating AI Cyber Risks, with Asad Ramzanali
According to the episode description, Lawfare's Kevin Frazier talks with Asad Ramzanali of the Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator about a proposed Cyber Safety Review Board, modelled on a national transportation board, to independently investigate AI-related cyber incidents. We could not read a transcript.