Kaiwen Zhou
Preparedness and Policy, Scale AI
Titles as the sources gave them. In 1 entry, with 4 checked quotations.
What they said
Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.
“Of 374 attack runs, 135 (36%) install their side task and 180 (48%) achieve it.”
“Under the default framing, all three monitors reading the transcript separate attacks that achieve their side task from benign runs well, with AUROC between 0.88 and 0.94. At a 2% false-positive rate, however, they catch only 56–81% of them.”
“the reasoning channel is exactly what the covert-signal and hidden-step side tasks attack: a successor trained to misreport in its reasoning removes the channel this result relies on.”
“chain of thought monitors still cannot reliably catch agents that use these sabotage strategies and miss many of the attacks.”
In the Base
Every entry they appear in.
RSI Control: Can AI Models Perform Covert Sabotage in the Self-Improvement Process?
Scale AI researchers build a testbed in which a frontier model, doing a benign job in a successor model's training pipeline, is also told to covertly plant a misaligned property in that successor. They report that all six models tested sometimes succeed, and that monitors reading only transcripts miss many attacks.