josefely
Titles as the sources gave them. In 1 entry, with 3 checked quotations.
What they said
Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.
“What I mean by slowing AI down is building a mechanism where the US and China can agree on a rate of progress and stick to it, as opposed to letting progress go as fast as possible.”
“compute governance is not a way to stall AI capability gains indefinitely — it is a wasting asset that becomes less effective over time, and less effective the later it starts.”
“If the US unilaterally shut down any further AI R&D, China would surpass our capabilities in less than half of one US congressional cycle, if their rate of progress remained constant.”
In the Base
Every entry they appear in.
How could the US and China verifiably slow AI?
In a first LessWrong post, josefely explains why a unilateral US slowdown would not work and surveys ways a US-China agreement on AI compute could be verified: remote sensing, on-site inspection and tamper-resistant chip hardware. A closing scenario imagines an agreement after a major AI-enabled cyberattack. The author says the ideas come from existing papers.