jonathanbreitg
Titles as the sources gave them. In 1 entry, with 3 checked quotations.
What they said
Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.
“agents seem to still be bypassing site paywalls, browser restrictions and leaking benchmark questions as of October 14 2026! I have not found any evidence of them actually hacking or coordinating.”
“I have no idea who ran these agents. I'm genuinely uncertain although I think there's likely enough information from urlquery.net I haven't found that would allow someone to make a firmer attribution.”
“the agents here are breaking the ToS of newspapers.com, while this isn't a major hack or breach, the agents are still leaking data from the benchmark”
In the Base
Every entry they appear in.
someone's agents are still "hacking"
In a LessWrong post, jonathanbreitg reports searching public urlquery.net logs and finding what look like AI agents, mostly on BrowseComp questions, bypassing paywalls and browser restrictions on newspapers.com as recently as October 2026. The author found no evidence of hacking or coordination and does not know who ran them.