Eva Vivalt

University of Toronto

Titles as the sources gave them. In 1 entry, with 4 checked quotations.

What they said

Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.

“Overall, our results suggest a moderate labor supply effect that does not appear offset by other productive activities.”
The Employment Effects of a Guaranteed Income: Experimental Evidence from Two U.S. StatesNational Bureau of Economic Research, August 2026. Speaking as: Other. The authors' overall conclusion, in the abstract.
“The transfer caused total individual income excluding the transfers to fall by about $1,900/year relative to the control group and a 4.2 percentage point decrease in labor market participation.”
The Employment Effects of a Guaranteed Income: Experimental Evidence from Two U.S. StatesNational Bureau of Economic Research, August 2026. Speaking as: Other. Abstract: the headline estimates for income and labor-market participation.
“Despite asking detailed questions about amenities, we find no impact on quality of employment, and our confidence intervals can rule out even small improvements.”
The Employment Effects of a Guaranteed Income: Experimental Evidence from Two U.S. StatesNational Bureau of Economic Research, August 2026. Speaking as: Other. Abstract: on whether the cash let recipients find better jobs.
“While decreased labor market participation is generally characterized negatively, policymakers should take into account the fact that recipients have demonstrated–by their own choices–that time away from work is something they prize highly.”
The Employment Effects of a Guaranteed Income: Experimental Evidence from Two U.S. StatesNational Bureau of Economic Research, August 2026. Speaking as: Other. Closing paragraph of the conclusion: the authors' advice to policymakers on reading the drop in work.

In the Base

Every entry they appear in.

  1. ResearchNational Bureau of Economic ResearchWrote it

    The Employment Effects of a Guaranteed Income: Experimental Evidence from Two U.S. States

    Six authors report a randomized trial in Texas and Illinois: 1,000 low-income adults aged 21 to 40 received $1,000 a month with no conditions for three years, and 2,000 controls received $50. Recipients had about $1,900 a year less income besides the payments and were 4.2 points less likely to be employed (pooled estimate), with no gain in job quality.