David Africa

Titles as the sources gave them. In 1 entry, with 2 checked quotations.

What they said

Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.

“Hence, AI safety researchers should stop working on patching reward hacks, and focus on things that will give us higher assurance.”
Patching reward hacks won’t fix reward hackingLessWrong, October 24, 2026. Speaking as: Other. Conclusion of Africa's post on reward hacking in model training.
“if you penalised a hacking model according to some monitor, you'll basically just obfuscate the hacking reasoning.”
Patching reward hacks won’t fix reward hackingLessWrong, October 24, 2026. Speaking as: Other. Africa cites small demonstrations that penalising detected hacking can hide the reasoning behind it.

In the Base

Every entry they appear in.

  1. EssayLessWrongWrote it

    Patching reward hacks won’t fix reward hacking

    In a LessWrong post, David Africa argues that closing loopholes one at a time will teach models to predict human judgment and hide misbehaviour, and that safety researchers should turn to approaches with higher assurance. Commenters, including Thomas Kwa and Kaarel, dispute this.