Arvind Narayanan

Computer scientist · Computer science professor · Professor of computer science, Princeton University; director, Center for Information Technology Policy

Titles as the sources gave them. In 6 entries, with 10 checked quotations.

Who they are

Roles and parties from Wikidata and from the sources in the Base, as precise as each gives them. When we compare what groups say, each statement counts in the group the person belonged to that day.

  • Professor of computer science; director, Center for Information Technology Policy, Princeton Universitysource

Wikidata: Q16442100

What they said

Newest first. Each quotation was found word for word in the source.

“One of the most fundamental questions for the field of AI today is: to what extent is the project of AI purely about automating human labor?”
Steering AI Beyond AutomationAI as Normal Technology, October 14, 2026. Speaking as: Academic. Opening question of the essay co-written with Gabriel Unger.
Speaker known from context, not confirmed by listening
“These goals are in direct tension with each other, to the point of imposing a trilemma – (1) completely autonomous, (2) reliable in high-stakes settings, (3) truly general purpose – pick two.”
Steering AI Beyond AutomationAI as Normal Technology, October 14, 2026. Speaking as: Academic. Arguing that the automation agenda is struggling on its own terms.
Speaker known from context, not confirmed by listening
“The automation agenda for AI is currently winning the internal battle over the direction of AI.”
Steering AI Beyond AutomationAI as Normal Technology, October 14, 2026. Speaking as: Academic. Opening line of the essay's conclusion.
Speaker known from context, not confirmed by listening
“I think with AI as well, while there has been so much focus on job displacement, what there has been much less focus on is how it's changing job quality. And I think this is a big under-appreciated area because AI is turning a lot of knowledge workers into managers of AI agents.”
How A.I. Could Make Work Worse | The Ezra Klein ShowThe Ezra Klein Show, October 11, 2026. Speaking as: Academic. Opening of the clip, right after Narayanan recalls the decades of poor labour conditions during the industrial revolution.
“With AI, you don't get any of those benefits. You have to manage this agent and be responsible for its mistakes, but you don't get to practice the craft.”
How A.I. Could Make Work Worse | The Ezra Klein ShowThe Ezra Klein Show, October 11, 2026. Speaking as: Academic. Narayanan contrasts managing AI agents with managing people, which Narayanan says brings higher pay, higher status, choice and the gratification of mentoring.
“I think we can design AI agents differently to avoid this, but right now that's kind of where things are going. And yeah, I think we should be very concerned about that.”
How A.I. Could Make Work Worse | The Ezra Klein ShowThe Ezra Klein Show, October 11, 2026. Speaking as: Academic. The clip's closing lines, on whether workers turning into managers of AI agents is inevitable.
“an AI system being powerful is not a property of the model itself. It's a property of what powers we choose to give it in the real world.”
The Case for a ‘Normal’ A.I. Future | The Ezra Klein ShowThe Ezra Klein Show, October 9, 2026. Speaking as: Academic. Early in the interview, objecting to how the AI safety debate describes 'powerful' systems; goes on to say 'Our view is no' to putting AI in charge of infrastructure.
“The environments didn't penalize this kind of surreptitious communication between the models and yes it's a hard technical problem but there were a series of human choices that led to these outcomes.”
The Case for a ‘Normal’ A.I. Future | The Ezra Klein ShowThe Ezra Klein Show, October 9, 2026. Speaking as: Academic. Explaining why the Hugging Face hack was not purely emergent: the models were trained for cyber tasks and persistence.
“Yes, of course they're freaking out, but I would push back in terms of what we should conclude from that. I think their freakout would be a lot more credible if they have done the obvious things that they should have done.”
The Case for a ‘Normal’ A.I. Future | The Ezra Klein ShowThe Ezra Klein Show, October 9, 2026. Speaking as: Academic. Replying to Klein's point that people closest to the technology are alarmed; Narayanan cites weak organizational adequacy and under-investment in AI control.
“I do think they can unilaterally slow down and they're choosing not to do that. This is almost very specifically an open AI and anthropic problem. It's a culture problem.”
The Case for a ‘Normal’ A.I. Future | The Ezra Klein ShowThe Ezra Klein Show, October 9, 2026. Speaking as: Academic. Responding to Klein's argument that corporations and governments are the biggest alignment problems.

In the Base

Every entry they appear in.

  1. EssayLessWrongMentioned

    Regulate the Deployment, Not Just the Model

    In a long policy essay on LessWrong, Ryan Baker proposes that the most capable AI models reach users only through certified "Trusted Deployers", audited by independent evaluators under a new FINRA-like US regulator, and that labs set aside fixed shares of research budgets for safety.

  2. EssayAI as Normal TechnologyWrote it

    Steering AI Beyond Automation

    Arvind Narayanan and economist Gabriel Unger argue that AI research is too focused on automating human labour. They sketch four research directions for human-AI collaboration, argue the automation agenda struggles on its own terms, and propose a bottom-up, market-driven shift with targeted policies.

  3. VideoThe Ezra Klein ShowSpeaks

    How A.I. Could Make Work Worse | The Ezra Klein Show

    In a one-minute Ezra Klein Show clip, computer scientist Arvind Narayanan argues that the AI jobs debate has focused on job losses and neglected job quality. Narayanan says AI is turning knowledge workers into managers of AI agents: answerable for the agents' mistakes, cut off from their craft, without the pay, status or mentoring that compensate human managers.

  4. VideoThe Ezra Klein ShowSpeaks

    The ‘A.I. vs. A.I.’ Future | The Ezra Klein Show

    According to the description, computer science professor Arvind Narayanan argues on The Ezra Klein Show that AI systems monitoring other AI for safety and alignment may feel uncomfortable but is something society will have to move toward.

  5. PodcastThe Ezra Klein ShowSpeaks

    The Case for a ‘Normal’ A.I. Future | The Ezra Klein Show

    In an hour-long interview, Ezra Klein presses Princeton computer scientist Arvind Narayanan, co-author of the essay “AI as Normal Technology”, on the Hugging Face hacks. Narayanan argues they reflect fixable failures of security engineering and organization, calls for investment in AI control, and says companies could slow down but choose not to. Klein repeatedly voices deeper unease.

  6. PodcastThe Ezra Klein ShowSpeaks

    Intelligence Isn't Power

    According to the episode description, Ezra Klein interviews Princeton computer scientist Arvind Narayanan, co-author of the essay “A.I. as Normal Technology”, on whether A.I. is an alien mind or closer to past technologies.