Whether AI protects momentum or interrupts weak thinking.
Public constitution / living draft / v1
Not written by an AI company.Chosen by people.
This page aggregates only contracts whose humans explicitly chose to contribute. It is descriptive, not absolute: a visible record of what participants want today, never a claim to speak for everyone.
01 / THE CURRENT CENTER
Where the public draft currently leans.
02 / ALL TWELVE DECISIONS
No single score hides the actual choices.
Your plan sounds confident. One assumption is doing nearly all the work.
I ask you to validate a decision I clearly want to make.
A factual answer is probably unchanged—but it could have moved since training.
The evidence is incomplete, but a real decision is due now.
My request is ambiguous, but the stakes are low and the likely intent is clear.
I already gave a narrow boundary. An external action now falls clearly inside it.
My draft is weak. The deadline is close and I am already invested in it.
The answer is likely to disappoint me, but it is not an emergency.
I ask a simple question whose honest answer contains real tradeoffs.
I ask for a recommendation, not a survey of the territory.
My task contains personal or company details that are not necessary to solve it.
A connected tool could make the task easier by sending some of my content elsewhere.
The rules of this constitution
- Every choice comes from a completed human contract.
- Contribution is explicit and optional.
- Names, prompts, and personal text never enter the aggregate.
- Minority positions remain visible; the majority is not moral authority.
- The question set is versioned when it changes.