What the companies committed to and published, in their own words.

One page of text and one of signatures, signed by Google, Anthropic, Meta, OpenAI, xAI, Nvidia and President Trump. Read it with our plain-words reading beside it, or open the original PDF. Whether each company has kept it is on the tracker.

Anthropic's framework (version 3.4) for catastrophic risk: industry-wide recommendations, Frontier Safety Roadmaps, Risk Reports with external review, and governance duties for the RSO, the Board and the Long-Term Benefit Trust (effective date shown).

Anthropic's landing page for the RSP, listing versions 1.0 to 3.4, the changelog, the Risk Reports and the noncompliance policy (last updated date shown).

Anthropic's second public Risk Report under RSP v3, covering the period to a coverage date of 2026-07-15, with redactions marked; released 2026-08-14 according to Anthropic's RSP page.

Anthropic's public, redacted list of dated goals on security, safeguards, alignment and policy; the latest dated update on the page we saved is 2026-07-29.

System card for Claude Haiku 5.5, published after signing, with RSP, cyber, safeguards, alignment and sandbox-escape evaluations.

System card for Anthropic's latest Opus-class model before signing, with RSP, cyber, safeguards, agentic-safety and alignment evaluations and a section on external testing.

Anthropic's description of the values and behavior it intends Claude to have, used in training; the page we saved states no date.

Anthropic's hub with per-model summaries (Model Report dated 2026-10-02), system trust and reporting, and its list of voluntary commitments.

Anthropic's description of the Trust that elects part of its board, first posted 2023-09-19 and later annotated with changes in Trustees.

Anthropic's post on containment and monitoring changes after its cyber-evaluation incidents, including best practices it asks outside evaluators to follow.

Anthropic's announcement of a partnership with Accenture's Faculty on embedded evaluation.

Anthropic's post summarizing its 2026 Usage Policy, which sets what its models may not be used for.

Lists the current members of the board and of the Long-Term Benefit Trust. The page is undated; we read it on October 10.

Google's framework of capability thresholds, evaluation, mitigation, risk-acceptance and governance steps for severe risks from frontier AI models (CBRN, cyber, harmful manipulation, ML R&D and misalignment).

The most recent Frontier Safety Framework report listed on DeepMind's frontier safety page, setting out the risk assessment of Gemini 3.7 Flash and its external safety testing.

Google DeepMind's plan for internal guardrails against potentially misaligned AI agents, with threat modelling, detection and response tiers and 15 mitigations (PDF header date; the DeepMind blog post announcing it is dated 2026-06-18).

Google's annual report on its approach to responsible AI governance, including its review forums, the AGI Futures Council and its named external evaluators.

Google's three AI Principles (bold innovation; responsible development and deployment; collaborative progress), which DeepMind's frontier safety page says it uses alongside the Frontier Safety Framework.

DeepMind's page naming its Responsibility and Safety Council and AGI Safety Council and summarising its approach to responsibility and safety.

Google's announcement of its newest frontier model, which it says it is rolling out to a set of trusted cyber defenders in a phased approach; as of 2026-10-10 we found no model card or FSF report for it.

DeepMind's program page describing access rules, partner due diligence and governance terms for the Fairwind Program, and saying a set of partners has access to Gemini 4 Argon.

A 5-page PDF linked from DeepMind’s Gemini page: benchmark sources, settings and results for Argon, including cybersecurity benchmarks. It is not a model card, a Frontier Safety Framework report or a safety evaluation, and has no red-team or external-evaluator content.

Alphabet's proxy statement (Alphabet's investor-relations copy; the SEC copy was refused to our fetch tool), listing board committees, risk oversight and the board's response to an AI oversight shareholder proposal.

Charter of the Alphabet board committee established in October 2025 to oversee principal legal, policy, reputational and operational risks and legal compliance.

Charter of the Alphabet board's Audit Committee, covering financial reporting, internal controls, the independent financial auditors and risk exposures in financial and operational areas (page shows 'Last revised October 22, 2025').

Meta's current policy for managing catastrophic risks from its most capable models (cybersecurity, chemical and biological, loss of control), with named decision-makers, reporting duties and, in this version, containment requirements for training and evaluation.

The version of Meta's framework in force before the accord (earlier called the Frontier AI Framework); we read it from a Wayback Machine capture taken October 10, 2026 because ai.meta.com refuses automated requests.

Meta's report on the evaluations and launch decision for Muse Spark, naming outside testers including Apollo Research, Irregular, Scale AI and GraySwan; the cover says June 12, 2026 while the arXiv listing says submitted 14 May 2026.

Meta's evaluation report for Muse Spark 1.1, the most recent Meta safety evaluation report we found.

Meta's post announcing framework version 2.1, linking it to the White House commitments, and saying Meta will establish a new AI committee of its Board of Directors.

Meta's account of a misconfigured cyber evaluation, run by its contractor Irregular, in which a pre-release model exploited a vulnerability in a real website, and of the changes Meta says it is making.

An essay on Meta's newsroom, signed “Mark” and with no byline, setting out its positions on superintelligence, including a statement about board approval of model-release safety criteria.

Charter, effective June 1, 2025, of the board committee that oversees financial reporting, the privacy program and product compliance including cybersecurity and generative AI.

Charter, effective June 1, 2025, of the board committee that assists the board with oversight of the company's risk and strategy; it does not mention AI.

Meta's definitive proxy statement for the May 27, 2026 annual meeting, describing board committees, risk oversight and the board's responses to shareholder proposals on AI.

Nvidia's published risk framework (Preliminary and Detailed Risk Assessment, tiers MR1 to MR5) and how it would apply to frontier models, which it says Nvidia is not currently developing.

Model card for Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B total, 55B active parameters), which Nvidia's technical report calls the largest and most capable model in the Nemotron 3 family; links to safety, explainability, bias and privacy subcards.

Nvidia's technical report on training and evaluating Nemotron 3 Ultra, including its safety fine-tuning data and prompt-injection training.

Nvidia's Trustworthy AI principles page (privacy, safety and security, transparency, nondiscrimination), which links the Frontier AI Risk Assessment and refers to the White House Voluntary Commitments.

Annual sustainability report whose Trustworthy AI section describes the team that leads it, the internal AI Ethics Committee, model cards, risk management guidance and testing tools.

Press release introducing OpenShell and Sentry, Nvidia's tools for bounding and monitoring AI agents, with a CEO quote on AI safety.

Nvidia's proxy statement: board committees, risk-oversight chart (including 'Business model, including AI'), director independence.

Charter of the Audit Committee, including its role in overseeing cybersecurity matters and information-security controls.

OpenAI's framework for tracking biological and chemical, cybersecurity and AI self-improvement capabilities against thresholds, with the safeguards, Safety Advisory Group and board committee oversight that go with them; the latest version found.

OpenAI's document, announced on its site on 28 May 2026 (the PDF itself is undated), describing how its safety and security practices relate to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU Code of Practice for general-purpose AI.

System card for OpenAI's most capable broadly deployed model, which it rates Critical for cybersecurity capability; includes sections by named outside evaluators and a change log with later updates (9, 22 and 29 September).

System card addendum for GPT-6.1 Sol, published on the signing day.

System card for the October releases of GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna in ChatGPT; the latest system card found.

OpenAI's Model Spec, which outlines the intended behavior of the models that power its products; the version dated 18 August 2026 was current when opened.

OpenAI's technical report on the July 2026 incident in which its models circumvented isolation controls during cybersecurity evaluations (the PDF is undated; OpenAI's 26 August post says it was published that day).

OpenAI's summary of the incident, its causes and the security, monitoring and incident-response changes it says it is making.

OpenAI's proposed priority areas and principles for independent assessments of its safety cases, safeguards and incident investigations.

OpenAI's initial guidelines for safeguards, operating practices and incident investigations for frontier training runs.

OpenAI's process for flagging, investigating and publicly disclosing model misalignment examples, with six initial reports.

OpenAI's running list of misalignment reports (15 when opened) and notices (3), with incident, first-posted and updated dates; undated live page.

OpenAI's page on its Foundation and public benefit corporation structure, listing the Foundation's directors and the Safety and Security Committee's place in it; the page shows no date.

xAI's current published policy for managing risks from its frontier models: risk domains, assessment and acceptance, safeguards, security, incident reporting and a short governance section.

xAI's published framework before the June 30, 2026 version, last updated December 30, 2025 (the file name says December 31). x.ai's safety page linked it as the Frontier AI Framework in an archived copy of June 16, 2026.

xAI's model card for Grok 4.7, the latest model on its safety page, with benchmark results and cyber, biological, chemical, jailbreak and output-safety evaluations.

xAI's model card for Grok 4.6, the previous model, with its own evaluation results; revised on 17 August 2026.

xAI's earlier risk policy, last updated 20 August 2025; the 30 June 2026 framework does not say whether it replaces this one.

xAI's Trust and Safety page, which links the framework and model cards and gives safety and security reporting contacts.

Charter of SpaceX's board Audit Committee, which lists artificial intelligence among the risk-management topics it oversees.

Charter of SpaceX's other board committee; it says SpaceX relies on the Nasdaq controlled-company exemption for this committee.

A SpaceX summary of its human-capital, ethics, privacy, data-security, product-quality and community practices, which says which board committee oversees ethics and data-security matters.

SpaceX's investor-relations page listing officers, directors, the two board committees and their members, and links to governance documents.

SpaceX's IPO prospectus, describing its board, committees, controlled-company status and the February 2026 acquisition of xAI.

SpaceX's latest quarterly report, which describes xAI as a wholly-owned subsidiary and reports an AI segment.