Sunday, October 25, 2026Radar run of Oct 25: 21 new entries, 10 read in full, 36 quotations checkedabout 5 minutes

Convovo's study finds Grok's API picks Republicans and OpenAI's GPT picks Democrats when forced to choose; OpenAI disputes its relevance to ChatGPT.

How to read this pageSerif their words, as the source published themMarked found word for word in the sourceSans our words

Oct 24
Read asSame facts, in the order each reader needs them.

Heard today

Press play to see and hear the person say it, from the source’s own player. Their words light up as they are spoken, and every one was found word for word in the source. Nothing loads from YouTube until you press play.

Group not yet recorded

“I think you will see the wholesale elimination of certain categories of jobs in the next 5 to 10 years.”

Murphy on the AI threat that Murphy calls most acute for many people.

Chris MurphyDemocratic Senator, ConnecticutNBC News, Oct 24 · found word for word · ▶ at 9:01

Group not yet recorded

“We are here today because we know that what's up next is a fork in the road. We know that the future of AI is not inevitable. It's for us to decide.”

Opening remarks at the Pro-Human Assembly, after reviewing how fast AI has advanced.

Max TegmarkFLI ChairFuture of Life Institute, Oct 24 · found word for word · ▶ at 6:23

Group not yet recorded

“And pro-human, like that's not a thing that made sense before.”

Aguirre introduces the assembly's name before handing over to Tegmark.

Anthony AguirreFLI PresidentFuture of Life Institute, Oct 24 · found word for word · ▶ at 2:29

The video’s captions give a time for each line, not each word, so a word can light a few tenths of a second early or late. The recording is the evidence; the highlight is a guide.

What changed today

Decisions, new evidence, corrections and commitments we read in full, one per story. Arguments and recaps don’t count.

New evidenceTechCrunch

Convovo's study finds Grok's API picks Republicans and OpenAI's GPT picks Democrats when forced to choose; OpenAI disputes its relevance to ChatGPT.

News: Forced to pick, Grok’s AI model chooses Republicans. OpenAI’s picks Democrats.

What it means for youTechCrunch reports that chatbot apps refused to say who to vote for, but a Convovo study suggests the models behind them lean towards one party.

For lawmakersConvovo's study gives lawmakers and election officials a test of political lean in AI models, weeks before the November 3 midterms, though OpenAI disputes its relevance to ChatGPT.

For researchersIn Convovo's test, GPT's Democratic lean persisted with search off, while Grok's Republican lean disappeared, suggesting different sources of bias: weights versus search behaviour.

“It has an implicit set of values in terms of what it cares about and how it leans”

Parikh, quoted by TechCrunch, on what the study suggests about the models.

Tapan ParikhCornell University professor; leads Convovoquoted second-hand · TechCrunch, Oct 24 · found word for word

New evidenceApricitas Economics

Apricitas Economics tallies more than 200,000 US creative-industry jobs lost in four years, while saying AI's share cannot be isolated from other causes.

Essay: AI and the Fall? of the Creative Class

What it means for youJoseph Politano of Apricitas Economics finds US media, film and arts employment falling for four years, but the essay says it is unclear how much of that AI causes.

For lawmakersPolitano suggests that any economic harm AI does to artists could be offset cheaply, for example by reversing recent cuts to the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities.

For researchersPolitano says AI's effect on arts jobs is hard to separate from Hollywood consolidation, offshoring and the rise of social media creators, so no firm attribution exists yet.

“In other words, the primary impacts of AI art will be on culture and society rather than the macroeconomy.”

Politano's conclusion about the scale of AI's effect on the arts.

Joseph PolitanoAuthor, Apricitas EconomicsApricitas Economics, Sep 27 · found word for word

Decision takenThe Verge

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro signed a law requiring disclosure labels on ads significantly modified or generated by AI, in any format.

News: Pennsylvania will require labels on AI-generated ads

What it means for youAds shown in Pennsylvania, from big brands to local restaurant flyers, must say when AI significantly made or changed them, though the rules leave room for exceptions.

For lawmakersPennsylvania joins the first states to mandate AI disclosure in advertising, applying to ads wherever made, but undefined terms such as 'significantly modified' and 'false' may be hard to enforce.

For researchersAds shown in Pennsylvania, from big brands to local restaurant flyers, must say when AI significantly made or changed them, though the rules leave room for exceptions.

“Pennsylvania is one of the first states to require disclosures on AI content. And it requires those labels regardless of where an ad was created.”

The Verge's own reporting on the scope of the new Pennsylvania law.

The VergeThe Verge, Oct 24 · found word for word

Said today

One checked quotation per person, people with the power to act or first-hand knowledge first, at most two from any one group.

Who is quoted here: 2 with no group recorded yet.

Group not yet recorded

“In the future, the most dangerous monitor failure modes will likely also be alignment issues.”

Roger's prediction, followed by collusion between monitor and agent as one example.

Fabien RogerLessWrong, Oct 24 · found word for word

Group not yet recorded

“With shadow computation, CoT goes from necessary to optional, and the model can speak publicly through its predictions while reasoning privately through shadow computation.”

Skye explains why the design matters for a model that wants to deceive its user.

SkyeLessWrong, Oct 24 · found word for word

Watch and listen

Interviews and talks we read in full, by what they add, then by reach. ▶ opens the video at the moment quoted.

3 of 9 videos and podcasts in this run were read in full, from captions or a transcript. Only those are ranked here; the rest are under “Everything else”, from their descriptions.

39min

VideoNBC News7K views

Election Edition: The AI Backlash Hits the Ballot Box

Sen. Chris Murphy argues Congress can regulate AI without expertise, that China gains if the US does not, and that Democrats would legislate.

“if members of Congress weren't allowed to regulate industries that they aren't experts in or industries in which they don't use the products, we wouldn't do anything.”

Murphy answers the argument, made by some colleagues, that Congress is not equipped to regulate AI.

Chris MurphyDemocratic Senator, ConnecticutNBC News, Oct 24 · found word for word · ▶ at 6:29

The entry, with 5 checked quotations

10min

VideoFuture of Life Institute1K views

Why The Human Future Is At Risk

Max Tegmark and Anthony Aguirre open the Pro-Human Assembly by arguing for AI that complements people, citing the rogue-agent incident as a warning.

“We are strong and united and we know, in fact, that 90 to 95% of Americans are with us.”

Tegmark, asking the room whether anyone wants AI that makes people economically obsolete; no source for the figure is given.

Max TegmarkFLI ChairFuture of Life Institute, Oct 24 · found word for word · ▶ at 7:10

The entry, with 5 checked quotations

Decided and promised

What someone with the power to act did or committed to. A promise is not a deed: commitments are followed until they are kept or broken.

  1. Decision takenPennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro signed a law requiring disclosure labels on ads significantly modified or generated by AI, in any format.The Verge
  2. New commitmentUK Chancellor John Healey says the coming budget will commit hundreds of millions of pounds to a British approach to AI.The Guardian

Stories that continued

Events several sources covered, read as one thread across days.

Coming up

Dates when a decision can still change, from our decision briefs, and how to take part.

  1. 26Oct

    United Kingdom

    Lords Report stage of the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill, in the Lords Chamber: the next chance to amend it. The list of amendments is still open until the day.

    Should the UK make reporting serious AI incidents a legal duty?

Questions you could put to a minister

  1. Will the Government table an amendment on reporting serious AI incidents before the Lords consider the Bill on October 26? If not, why not?
  2. If AI incident reporting is to be required, who should have to report: the developer of the AI system, the organization using it, or both?
  3. What should count as a reportable incident or near miss, and who should receive the reports and act on them?

From the decision brief, in neutral words. We recommend no answer.

Where the answers stand

2 of the nine questions have an answer we keep up to date, with the reason for every change. All nine questions

Everything else today: 15 more entries, filed under the nine questions

Can AI systems act beyond what people intended or allowed?

Who can demand evidence, delay a release or stop an unsafe deployment?

What happens to work, income and the economy?

How is AI changing childhood, health and daily life?

How fast is AI advancing, and where is it heading?

Search and filter the week’s record

How this edition was made

So you can judge how far to trust it.

  1. 114 of 114sources answered
  2. 349items they published, October 24–25, 2026
  3. 32kept by a wide keyword filter
  4. 21became entries, 10 read in full
  5. 36quotations found word for word in the saved text
How this edition chooses
  • What changed: entries whose change is a decision, new evidence, a correction or a commitment, that we read in full; most important first; one per story.
  • Heard: the same rule as Said, from the quotations we can play: the recording’s captions carry them. Any entry qualifies, the weights put the ones that matter first, and a person is quoted once on the page.
  • Said: one checked quotation per person from the entries that matter, people with the power to act or first-hand knowledge first, at most two from any one group.
  • Watch and listen: interviews and talks we read in full, by importance, then by views.
  • Decided and promised: decisions, corrections and commitments, decisions first.
  • New research: papers and reports, the ones we read in full first.
  • The headline: written for the edition when we can; otherwise the top change.

Agents pick the items, write the summaries and the “why it matters” lines, and label what kind of change each one is. Code checks every quotation against the text we saved: the words must be there, in order, without a dropped “not”. That proves the words are in the source; it does not prove the person meant them as quoted. English sources only; X is not read yet.