Could Abdul El-Sayed’s plan for AI companies stave off catastrophe?

In a Guardian opinion piece, Jerel Ezell argues that Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed's plan, AI Under Democracy, could bridge political divides. It would force divestment from frontier labs and make most board seats publicly chosen.

About Anthropic or ClaudeClaude, made by Anthropic, wrote this entry. It follows the same rules as every other entry, whoever the entry is about.

Why it matters

The same thing, for different readers.

What it means for you

A Michigan Senate candidate proposes that the public pick most board members at big AI companies, and a Guardian columnist says polls show growing public worry about AI.

For lawmakers

Abdul El-Sayed's plan would require Google, Microsoft and others to divest from frontier labs and regulate data centres, going further than moratorium proposals.

The question it raises

Jerel Ezell asks whether the public should hold a controlling say in companies building powerful AI, a question of democratic ownership over a technology.

In their own words

Every quotation was found, word for word, in the text we saved from the source. That shows the words are there; it does not make them true, or prove the speaker meant them as quoted.

From the source’s own text.

“Far and away the most controversial – but essential – part of El-Sayed’s plan to thwart an AI-fueled catastrophe is his call for 50% + one of board seats (a simple majority) at influential AI companies to be publicly appointed or democratically elected.”
Jerel Ezell, Executive director, Center for AI and Everybody; assistant professor, University of ChicagoEzell describes the central, most contested element of El-Sayed's AI Under Democracy plan.
Found word for word in the source
“Under El-Sayed’s proposal, the tech giants would have to divest or abandon those investments within a defined transitional period.”
Jerel Ezell, Executive director, Center for AI and Everybody; assistant professor, University of ChicagoEzell on the plan's divestment rule, after noting Microsoft's estimated 27% stake in OpenAI and Google's 14% of Anthropic.
Found word for word in the source

The record

Questions
Who can demand evidence, delay a release or stop an unsafe deployment? · How fast is AI advancing, and where is it heading?
People
Jerel Ezell (Wrote it, Executive director, Center for AI and Everybody; assistant professor, University of Chicago) · Abdul El-Sayed (About them, Democratic candidate for US Senate, Michigan) · Mike Rogers (Mentioned, Republican challenger) · Bernie Sanders (Mentioned) · Sam Altman (Mentioned, OpenAI) · Dario Amodei (Mentioned, Anthropic)
What we read
We read the whole source.
Found by
The Radar, run of October 30, 2026, via the-guardian-ai (tier 2: a major outlet’s own reporting)
Cite this
The Guardian, “Could Abdul El-Sayed’s plan for AI companies stave off catastrophe?”, October 29, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/the-guardian-2026-10-29-el-sayed-ai-under-democracy
Our notesOpinion piece. The poll figures and stake estimates are the author's; not checked against their sources. Mentions Anthropic.