Coming soon: New York City’s hearing on AI risks

Gary Marcus previews planned testimony for a New York City Council hearing on AI policy. Marcus argues AI is powerful but hard to control and that the administration in Washington will not act, and urges the council to back a bill requiring third-party validation of AI used in the city, plus whistleblower protections, citing signs OpenAI may have fired whistleblowers.

Why it matters

The same thing, for different readers.

What it means for you

New York City is weighing whether AI used in the city must pass independent checks, and whether to protect workers who warn about AI dangers.

For lawmakers

Marcus urges a city-level, FDA-style approval regime for AI and whistleblower protections, arguing cities and states can act where Congress has not.

The question it raises

Can a city govern a global technology, and should AI need approval before reaching people, the way a new drug does?

In their own words

Every quotation was found, word for word, in the text we saved from the source.

From the source’s own text.

“Contemporary AI is like a bull in a china shop, powerful and impressive, but difficult to control.”
Gary Marcus, NYU Professor EmeritusFrom the preview of Marcus's remarks for the New York City Council hearing on AI policy.
Matches the source exactly
“Not every fear that people talk about strikes me as realistic – I rather doubt that human extinction is imminent, despite all the headlines – but it is clear that AI comes with serious risks.”
Gary Marcus, NYU Professor EmeritusMarcus, after listing hacking incidents by AI agents, deepfakes and chatbots implicated in suicides.
Matches the source exactly
“What we need, above all else, is an FDA-like regulatory regime for AI, in which AI developers bring their software to independent review, much as drug manufacturers bring their new drugs to the FDA for a review.”
Gary Marcus, NYU Professor EmeritusMarcus's central proposal; Marcus adds that developers should show benefits outweigh risks or be denied market access.
Matches the source exactly
“New York City is in a position to do what the US Senate failed to do: demand independent regulatory review for AI used in its borders.”
Gary Marcus, NYU Professor EmeritusMarcus on a council bill on third-party validation, which Marcus urges the council to support.
Matches the source exactly
“Without strong protections from whistleblowing, like New York City is considering, we are all in trouble.”
Gary Marcus, NYU Professor EmeritusMarcus, after writing that recent events suggest OpenAI may have fired employees who were whistleblowing.
Matches the source exactly

The record

Questions
Who can demand evidence, delay a release or stop an unsafe deployment? · Are AI companies putting stronger safeguards into practice?
People
Gary Marcus (Wrote it, NYU Professor Emeritus) · Sam Altman (Mentioned)
What we read
We read the whole source.
Found by
The Radar, run of October 12, 2026, via marcus-on-ai (tier 1: the source’s own channel or an official record)
Cite this
Marcus on AI, “Coming soon: New York City’s hearing on AI risks”, October 5, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/marcus-2026-10-05-nyc-hearing-ai-risks
Our notesA preview of planned remarks, published before the hearing (the post says Monday 11am Eastern, dated Oct 5); delivered testimony may differ and we did not check it. Marcus's title is from Marcus's self-description ('scientist, author, and NYU Professor Emeritus'). The bills are not named or numbered in the post. Marcus quotes Sam Altman via Politico ('the world should accept some bad things happening...'); second-hand, not quoted here. Saved text includes reader comments, which are not used. Transformer (2ee15e5e5538) reports that at the NYC Council hearing four frontier AI firms were questioned and Alex Bores accused OpenAI's representatives of perjury.