The BaseEssayLessWrong
Have LLMs passed the Turing test?
According to the excerpt, EJIKAGORAMEN argues that no publicly available model passes a strong Turing test, one convincing anyone, including frequent users, that it is human. The post reasons that an AI able to do so would already have flooded the internet with undetectable spam.
Why it matters
The same thing, for different readers.
What it means for you
EJIKAGORAMEN argues the internet is still usable because no public model convincingly passes as human, a claim readers can test themselves.
The question it raises
EJIKAGORAMEN asks what counts as passing the Turing test and whether duplicitous writing is the real threshold for AI passing as human.
The record
- Questions
- How fast is AI advancing, and where is it heading? · How is AI changing childhood, health and daily life?
- People
- EJIKAGORAMEN (Wrote it)
- What we read
- We have read only the description the publisher gives. No quotations until someone reads the source itself.
- Found by
- The Radar, run of October 27, 2026, via
lesswrong(tier 1: the source’s own channel or an official record) - Cite this
- LessWrong, “Have LLMs passed the Turing test?”, October 27, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/lesswrong-2026-10-27-have-llms-passed-turing-test
Our notesLight lane: excerpt only.