The BaseNewsThe Guardian

‘Digital hostile environment’: AI secretly being embedded across Home Office, report claims

The Guardian reports on a new Open Rights Group study, built from published material, freedom of information requests and MPs' questions, which says AI is used across the UK Home Office in immigration and border work with little disclosure. The Home Office says AI assists caseworkers and does not make decisions.

Open the source ↗

Why it matters

The same thing, for different readers.

What it means for you

People applying for asylum in the UK may have their age, case priority or phone contents handled with AI tools, and the Home Office has published little about how.

For lawmakers

Open Rights Group asks the UK government to regulate AI in immigration, narrow its national security grounds for refusing information requests, and keep a public register of AI tools.

For researchers

The report relies on limited Home Office publications, freedom of information replies and MPs' questions, so its picture of AI use is built from partial disclosure.

The question it raises

The report questions whether decisions about who may stay in a country can be treated as a technical problem, and who is accountable when AI tools fail.

In their own words

Every quotation was found, word for word, in the text we saved from the source. That shows the words are there; it does not make them true, or prove the speaker meant them as quoted.

From the source’s own text.

“In spite of questions and requests, the Home Office has been reluctant to publish the documents that would explain how AI is used in asylum processing, what the problems are and how they are being addressed.”
Bell Ribeiro-Addy, Labour MPLabour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy, one of three cross-party backers of the report, on what the Home Office has published.
Found word for word in the sourceAs quoted in the text we read, not the speaker’s own text or a transcript of their words
“Migration is a human phenomenon and experience, not a technical problem that can be fixed by artificial intelligence.”
Sara Alsherif, programme manager, Open Rights GroupOpen Rights Group's programme manager on the report's call for transparency and strict regulation.
Found word for word in the sourceAs quoted in the text we read, not the speaker’s own text or a transcript of their words
“Asylum decisions are made by trained caseworkers, with AI tools used only to assist in navigating interview records and policy information. They cannot be used in isolation and do not make decisions on claims.”
Home Office spokespersonA Home Office spokesperson replies to the report, quoted by the Guardian.
Found word for word in the sourceAs quoted in the text we read, not the speaker’s own text or a transcript of their words

The record

Questions
Who can demand evidence, delay a release or stop an unsafe deployment? · How is AI changing childhood, health and daily life?
People
Diane Taylor (Wrote it, Guardian reporter) · Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Speaks, Labour MP) · Sara Alsherif (Speaks, programme manager, Open Rights Group) · Home Office spokesperson (Speaks)
What we read
We read the whole source.
Found by
The Radar, run of October 27, 2026, via the-guardian-ai (tier 2: a major outlet’s own reporting)
Cite this
The Guardian, “‘Digital hostile environment’: AI secretly being embedded across Home Office, report claims”, October 27, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/guardian-2026-10-27-ai-embedded-home-office-report
Our notesSecondhand report of the Open Rights Group study (Automated Discrimination: Unpacking the Digital Hostile Environment); the report itself was not read. The Guardian headline says 'report claims'; the Home Office disputes that AI replaces human decisions.