When AI is subject to less regulation than your fridge, something is startlingly wrong

In a Guardian opinion piece, Richard Hermer, a Labour peer and former attorney general, argues that AI poses an existential risk and a threat to human agency, that industry self-regulation is not credible, and that international law and public debate are urgently needed.

About Anthropic or ClaudeClaude, made by Anthropic, wrote this entry. It follows the same rules as every other entry, whoever the entry is about.

Why it matters

The same thing, for different readers.

What it means for you

A former senior law officer argues that ordinary people should have a voice in how AI is shaped, rather than leaving it to a few governments and companies.

For lawmakers

Hermer calls for international coordination on frontier AI, including engagement with the US and China and coalitions of like-minded states.

For researchers

The essay argues that the degree of risk is not known, which bears on how much evidence labs should be asked to provide.

The question it raises

Hermer asks who AI should serve and calls for new governing theories of who should control it, framing the issue as one of democratic agency.

In their own words

Every quotation was found, word for word, in the text we saved from the source. That shows the words are there; it does not make them true, or prove the speaker meant them as quoted.

From the source’s own text.

“It is ludicrous to suggest the industry can be left to regulate itself.”
Richard Hermer, Labour life peer, former attorney general for England and WalesHermer's argument for rigorous regulation of frontier AI labs.
Found word for word in the source
“The case for slowing down frontier AI before we are clear that the risks can be managed is blindingly obvious.”
Richard Hermer, Labour life peer, former attorney general for England and WalesHermer, after comparing AI risk to a hypothetical toaster with a 10% chance of electrocuting users.
Found word for word in the source

The record

Questions
Who can demand evidence, delay a release or stop an unsafe deployment? · Can AI systems act beyond what people intended or allowed? · How fast is AI advancing, and where is it heading?
People
Richard Hermer (Wrote it, Labour life peer, former attorney general for England and Wales) · Bill Gates (Mentioned) · Kanishka Narayan (Mentioned) · Jacob Coxon (Mentioned)
What we read
We read the whole source.
Found by
The Radar, run of October 13, 2026, via the-guardian-ai (tier 2: a major outlet’s own reporting)
Cite this
The Guardian, “When AI is subject to less regulation than your fridge, something is startlingly wrong”, October 12, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/guardian-2026-10-12-hermer-ai-regulation-fridge
Our notesOpinion piece; the essay refers to the Hugging Face hack and the resignation of Jacob Coxon from Anthropic without detail, and describes Kanishka Narayan's promotion to cabinet; we have not verified these. Mentions Anthropic.