The BaseNewsBBC News

The Indian workers filming their work to train AI

The BBC reports from Mumbai on Indian workers paid to film their hands at work, with footage sold to AI and robotics firms to train physical AI. Company founders, an academic and workers describe pay, consent and what the work may lead to.

Open the source ↗

Why it matters

The same thing, for different readers.

What it means for you

Hairdressers, tailors and teachers in India are paid a few dollars a day to wear cameras while working, so that robots can learn their tasks.

For lawmakers

A Tata Institute academic quoted by the BBC wants governments to regulate AI, warning that workers may realise too late what their footage was used for.

For researchers

Humyn Labs' founder says no archive of embodied human activity exists, so robot training data must be captured from scratch in real settings.

The question it raises

Workers who record their own jobs may be helping to build machines that could replace them, and the BBC's sources disagree on whether that is likely.

In their own words

Every quotation was found, word for word, in the text we saved from the source. That shows the words are there; it does not make them true, or prove the speaker meant them as quoted.

From the source’s own text.

“We record hands, not faces, and where multi-camera rigs do capture more of the body or environment, we blur faces out. No names, no contact details, nothing that identifies them personally goes into what we hand off.”
Shahil Baig, co-founder and CEO, Rashdan TechnologiesBaig describes to the BBC how Rashdan Technologies protects the identity of workers whose footage it sells.
Found word for word in the sourceAs quoted in the text we read, not the speaker’s own text or a transcript of their words
“By the time workers realise what they have participated in, things may have gone too far,”
Bino Paul, senior professor, School of Management and Labour Studies, Tata Institute of Social SciencesPaul, asked whether workers are collecting data for machines that may take their jobs, says it is too early to tell but warns of this risk.
Found word for word in the sourceAs quoted in the text we read, not the speaker’s own text or a transcript of their words
“India can't afford to stay a footage supplier. It needs to move up the value chain: from recording raw video to owning the pipeline that turns that video into something usable”
Manish Agarwal, founder, Humyn LabsAgarwal, whose company collects human-generated data, argues that raw footage collection will lose value as competitors multiply.
Found word for word in the sourceAs quoted in the text we read, not the speaker’s own text or a transcript of their words
“It doesn't cost me anything. I'm already doing the stitching, already doing the cutting. Now I just get paid a little more for it”
Mohammed Arman, textile worker in BangaloreArman, a textile worker in Bangalore, explains why the BBC's interviewee accepted extra pay to wear a head-mounted camera.
Found word for word in the sourceAs quoted in the text we read, not the speaker’s own text or a transcript of their words

The record

Questions
What happens to work, income and the economy? · How fast is AI advancing, and where is it heading?
People
Priti Gupta (Wrote it, Technology Reporter, BBC) · Mohammed Ashim (About them, barber in Bengaluru) · Shahil Baig (Speaks, co-founder and CEO, Rashdan Technologies) · Manish Agarwal (Speaks, founder, Humyn Labs) · Bino Paul (Speaks, senior professor, School of Management and Labour Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences) · Mohammed Arman (Speaks, textile worker in Bangalore) · Jolly Arifur (About them, science teacher, Guntakal)
What we read
We read the whole source.
Found by
The Radar, run of October 24, 2026, via bbc-technology (tier 2: a major outlet’s own reporting)
Cite this
BBC News, “The Indian workers filming their work to train AI”, October 23, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/bbc-2026-10-23-indian-workers-filming-train-ai
Our notesThe article says Baig's company pays $5 to $10 for eight to 10 hours, and Arifur $2 to $3 per hour; these are the interviewees' own figures. The text switches from Baig to 'Agarwal' when saying dozens of competitors are expected, so who expects that is unclear (the caption credits Baig). 'Hundreds of thousands' of such workers is the BBC's claim without a source.