Not All Misalignment Is Alike: A Decomposed Benchmark for Emergent Misalignment

According to the abstract, Domingues and five co-authors introduce EMERGE, a benchmark that tracks eight separate misaligned behaviours when models are fine-tuned on narrow tasks, and apply it to 8 open-weight models and 13 fine-tuning datasets.

Why it matters

The same thing, for different readers.

What it means for you

Domingues and colleagues find that two AI models can look equally misaligned by one number while misbehaving in quite different ways.

For researchers

Domingues and colleagues propose EMERGE as a shared standard for measuring emergent misalignment, controlling for capability loss, coherence and refusal, so studies become comparable.

In their own words

Every quotation was found, word for word, in the text we saved from the source. That shows the words are there; it does not make them true, or prove the speaker meant them as quoted.

From the source’s own text.

“we find that models with similar broad misalignment rates can exhibit very different behavioural profiles that a single score cannot capture.”
Afonso DominguesThe abstract's main result after applying EMERGE to 8 open-weight models and 13 fine-tuning datasets.
Found word for word in the source

How the finding was reached

In our words, from the source. Weigh the finding by how it was made.

What was done
EMERGE, a decomposed benchmark tracking changes in eight misaligned behaviours from base to fine-tuned models on out-of-domain prompts, against matched benign controls, with capability, coherence and refusal tracked as confounders; applied to 8 open-weight models and 13 fine-tuning datasets.
What it found
Models with similar broad misalignment rates can show very different behavioural profiles that a single score cannot capture.
What it does not show
Not stated in the abstract; only the abstract was read. Results concern open-weight models and the 13 datasets used.
Status
A preprint: not yet peer reviewed

The record

Questions
Can AI systems act beyond what people intended or allowed?
People
Afonso Domingues (Wrote it) · Mubashara Akhtar (Wrote it) · Bhada Yun (Wrote it) · Xin Chen (Wrote it) · Lukas Fluri (Wrote it) · Anna Hedström (Wrote it)
What we read
We read the abstract.
Found by
The Radar, run of November 6, 2026, via arxiv-ai-safety-query (tier 1: the source’s own channel or an official record)
Cite this
arXiv, “Not All Misalignment Is Alike: A Decomposed Benchmark for Emergent Misalignment”, November 5, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/arxiv-2026-11-05-emerge-emergent-misalignment-benchmark
Our notesOnly the arXiv abstract page was saved; full paper not read, so the eight behaviours and the numbers are not given here.