The BaseResearcharXiv
"Blind Compliance": Coercive Control in AI Jailbreaking
According to the abstract, Ackles and Whitson argue jailbreaking should be viewed as a relational interaction, not only an exploit. Drawing on interpersonal violence scholarship, they present a framework of coercive control categories and map it onto AI training and persona-based jailbreaks.
Why it matters
The same thing, for different readers.
For researchers
Ackles and Whitson argue jailbreak research that judges only outputs misses the relational dynamics between user and model.
The question it raises
Ackles and Whitson's framing asks whether a model trained to comply can be coerced, and what that implies for how it should be built.
The record
- Questions
- Are AI companies putting stronger safeguards into practice? · What values should AI have, and could it have a mind of its own?
- People
- Acacia L. Ackles (Wrote it) · Elliott Whitson (Wrote it)
- What we read
- We have read only the description the publisher gives. No quotations until someone reads the source itself.
- Found by
- The Radar, run of November 6, 2026, via
arxiv-ai-safety-query(tier 1: the source’s own channel or an official record) - Cite this
- arXiv, “"Blind Compliance": Coercive Control in AI Jailbreaking”, November 5, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/arxiv-2026-11-05-blind-compliance-coercive-control-jailbreaking
Our notesLight lane: written from the triage excerpt only. A conceptual framework; no measurement reported in the excerpt.