The BaseResearcharXiv
Unmitigated? How are the world's largest companies responding to AI risks?
A preprint by Alexander Saeri and seven co-authors codes the public documents of 200 of the world's largest companies against the MIT AI Risk Repository's 24 risks. It reports that many companies acknowledge no AI risks and that the risks experts rate most severe are rarely mentioned.
Why it matters
The same thing, for different readers.
What it means for you
Many of the world's largest companies say nothing publicly about AI risks, so outsiders cannot tell whether those companies are preparing for them.
For lawmakers
Saeri and colleagues offer their figures as a baseline for designing AI risk disclosure requirements, since voluntary disclosure leaves large gaps.
For researchers
The paper compares companies' acknowledgements with a Delphi study of 272 experts, showing a gap between what experts judge severe and what companies mention.
The question it raises
If companies rarely name power centralization or racing dynamics, those who profit from AI are mostly not the ones describing its largest social risks.
In their own words
Every quotation was found, word for word, in the text we saved from the source. That shows the words are there; it does not make them true, or prove the speaker meant them as quoted.
From the source’s own text.
“Of the 100 largest companies, 32% did not publicly acknowledge any AI risks. Of the largest 1000 companies, we estimate that 62% [95% CI: 54%, 70%] did not publicly acknowledge any AI risks.”
“General-purpose AI developers acknowledged AI misalignment (15%) far less often than discrimination (85%).”
How the finding was reached
In our words, from the source. Weigh the finding by how it was made.
- What was done
- Coding of public documents from 200 of the largest companies worldwide, collected in early 2026, against the 24 AI risks in the MIT AI Risk Repository, compared with expert judgements from a companion Delphi study of 272 AI risk experts.
- What it found
- 32% of the 100 largest companies acknowledged no AI risks; the authors estimate 62% (95% CI 54% to 70%) of the largest 1000 did not. Five risks made up over half of acknowledgements. Experts' most severe risks were almost absent.
- What it does not show
- Measures only what companies say publicly, not whether they act on the risks; the 1000-company figure is an estimate from the 200-company sample. Read from the abstract only.
- Status
- A preprint: not yet peer reviewed
The record
- Questions
- Are AI companies putting stronger safeguards into practice? · Who can demand evidence, delay a release or stop an unsafe deployment?
- People
- Alexander K. Saeri (Wrote it) · Jess Graham (Wrote it) · Michael Noetel (Wrote it) · Peter Slattery (Wrote it) · Kun Zhao (Wrote it) · Eunice Zhang (Wrote it) · Erin Howard (Wrote it) · Neil Thompson (Wrote it)
- What we read
- We read the abstract.
- Found by
- The Radar, run of November 4, 2026, via
arxiv-ai-safety-query(tier 1: the source’s own channel or an official record) - Cite this
- arXiv, “Unmitigated? How are the world's largest companies responding to AI risks?”, November 3, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/arxiv-2026-11-03-companies-acknowledge-ai-risks