The BaseResearcharXiv
Aligning Institutional Power and Operational Ability
According to the abstract, Marino, Sileno, van Binsbergen and van Engers argue that agentic AI systems need designs matching the responsibilities given to them with the ability to fulfil them. They propose a formal framework based on process modelling and institutional power to find mismatches such as privilege escalation.
Why it matters
The same thing, for different readers.
For lawmakers
The authors argue that responsibilities assigned to AI agents should match what those agents can actually do, a point relevant to rules on delegation and accountability.
The question it raises
If an AI agent is given duties it cannot fulfil, or powers beyond its duties, who bears responsibility is unclear; the authors approach this as a design problem.
The record
- Questions
- Can AI systems act beyond what people intended or allowed? · Who can demand evidence, delay a release or stop an unsafe deployment?
- People
- Andrea Marino (Wrote it) · Giovanni Sileno (Wrote it) · Thomas van Binsbergen (Wrote it) · Tom van Engers (Wrote it)
- What we read
- We have read only the description the publisher gives. No quotations until someone reads the source itself.
- Found by
- The Radar, run of October 28, 2026, via
arxiv-ai-safety-query(tier 1: the source’s own channel or an official record) - Cite this
- arXiv, “Aligning Institutional Power and Operational Ability”, October 27, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/arxiv-2026-10-27-institutional-power-operational-ability
Our notesLight lane: written from the triage excerpt, which appears to be the whole short abstract. A conceptual and formal paper, not an empirical one.