Phantom Forgetting: How BatchNorm State Fakes Deletion in Edge Split Machine Unlearning

According to the abstract, Agrawal, Chillara and Mandan examine whether Batch Normalization statistics can create an apparent forgetting signal in split edge-server networks even when no learnable weight changes. They define a state-only diagnostic and a state-induced forgetting gap, tested on CIFAR-10 classes.

Why it matters

The same thing, for different readers.

For researchers

Agrawal, Chillara and Mandan caution that forget-set accuracy alone can overstate data deletion when normalization state shifts.

How the finding was reached

In our words, from the source. Weigh the finding by how it was made.

What was done
A state-only diagnostic separating learnable-parameter change from BN-buffer change, tested on all ten CIFAR-10 forget classes in edge, server and joint placements.
What it found
The excerpt is cut off before the results.
What it does not show
Small image-classification setting; abstract excerpt only.
Status
A preprint: not yet peer reviewed

The record

Questions
Are AI companies putting stronger safeguards into practice?
People
Anand Agrawal (Wrote it) · Anil Kumar Chillara (Wrote it) · Naresh Mandan (Wrote it)
What we read
We have read only the description the publisher gives. No quotations until someone reads the source itself.
Found by
The Radar, run of October 27, 2026, via arxiv-ai-safety-query (tier 1: the source’s own channel or an official record)
Cite this
arXiv, “Phantom Forgetting: How BatchNorm State Fakes Deletion in Edge Split Machine Unlearning”, October 26, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/arxiv-2026-10-26-phantom-forgetting-batchnorm-unlearning
Our notesLight lane: excerpt only; results not visible.