Who Is Sycophantic to Whom? Confident LLMs, Human Deference, and the Collapse of Trust Calibration

According to the abstract, a small experiment with 32 participants had people learn science topics from assistants built on GPT-5-mini whose facts were partly replaced by falsehoods. The authors report people adopted stated falsehoods about 65% of the time and held them with high confidence.

Why it matters

The same thing, for different readers.

What it means for you

People who learn from a confident chatbot may absorb its mistakes and feel sure of them, so a confident tone is no sign of accuracy.

For researchers

Reverses the usual sycophancy question and reports that confidence stopped distinguishing right answers from wrong ones, in a small within-subjects sample.

How the finding was reached

In our words, from the source. Weigh the finding by how it was made.

What was done
Within-subjects experiment: 32 participants studied up to five science topics with five GPT-5-mini assistants whose briefings had 0, 25, 50, 75 or 100% of facts replaced by plausible falsehoods; 104 quizzes, 1,040 answers.
What it found
Scores fell from 7.4 to 2.9 out of 10; the planted falsehood was chosen on 60% of falsified items versus 11% of correctly taught ones (odds ratio 12.5); falsehoods were adopted about 65% of the time and held at 8.4/10 confidence.
What it does not show
Abstract only was read; small sample, one model, and a lab setting with deliberately falsified briefings.
Status
A preprint: not yet peer reviewed

The record

Questions
How is AI changing childhood, health and daily life?
People
Deepthika S (Wrote it) · Pawni Yadav (Wrote it) · B. Sankar (Wrote it)
What we read
We have read only the description the publisher gives. No quotations until someone reads the source itself.
Found by
The Radar, run of October 23, 2026, via arxiv-ai-safety-query (tier 1: the source’s own channel or an official record)
Cite this
arXiv, “Who Is Sycophantic to Whom? Confident LLMs, Human Deference, and the Collapse of Trust Calibration”, October 22, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/arxiv-2026-10-22-confident-llms-human-deference
Our notesLight lane: written from the triage excerpt only, which was cut off.