What Output-Only Review Cannot Verify: Study Contracts for Research Agents

According to the abstract, the authors propose 'study contracts' tying declared experimental choices and claim scope to recorded execution evidence in AI-generated studies; a deterministic checker detected all eight mutations in their small diagnostic.

Why it matters

The same thing, for different readers.

For researchers

Argues that reviewing only outputs cannot catch some defects in AI-generated studies without knowing what was approved beforehand.

The record

Questions
Can AI systems act beyond what people intended or allowed?
People
Eitan Waks (Wrote it) · Ben Glocker (Wrote it)
What we read
We read the abstract.
Found by
The Radar, run of October 12, 2026, via arxiv-ai-safety-query (tier 1: the source’s own channel or an official record)
Cite this
arXiv, “What Output-Only Review Cannot Verify: Study Contracts for Research Agents”, October 8, 2026. Entry in the Ctrl AI Base, https://ctrlai.com/base/arxiv-2026-10-08-study-contracts-research-agents
Our notespreprint, not peer reviewed; abstract excerpt is cut off